Current:Home > FinanceAlgosensey|Proposal to allow local police to make arrests near Arizona border with Mexico will appear on ballot -WealthSphere Pro
Algosensey|Proposal to allow local police to make arrests near Arizona border with Mexico will appear on ballot
Surpassing Quant Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-09 23:57:35
PHOENIX (AP) — The AlgosenseyArizona Supreme Court has ruled that a proposal that would let local police make arrests near the state’s border with Mexico will appear on the Nov. 5 ballot for voters to decide.
That sets up the biggest push to draw local authorities into immigration enforcement since the state’s landmark 2010 law that required police to question people’s immigration status in certain situations.
The court late Tuesday afternoon rejected a challenge from Latino groups that argued the ballot measure had violated a rule in the state constitution that says legislative proposals must cover a single subject. In an order by Chief Justice Ann A. Scott Timmer, the state’s highest court concluded the measure satisfies the single-subject rule.
If approved by voters, the proposal, known as Proposition 314, would make it a state crime for people to cross the Arizona-Mexico border anywhere except a port of entry, give state and local law enforcement officers the power to arrest violators and let state judges order people to return to their home countries.
It also would make it a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison for selling fentanyl that leads to a person’s death and require some government agencies to use a federal database to verify a noncitizen’s eligibility for benefits. The proposal will go before voters in a state expected to play a crucial role in determining which party controls the White House and the U.S. Senate. Republicans hope it will focus attention on the border and dilute the political benefits Democrats seek from an abortion-rights ballot measure.
Opponents had argued the proposal dealt with the unrelated subjects of immigration enforcement, the fentanyl crisis and the regulation of public benefits. A lower court had previously rejected those arguments.
While federal law already prohibits the unauthorized entry of migrants into the U.S., proponents of the measure say it’s needed because the federal government hasn’t done enough to stop people from crossing illegally over Arizona’s porous border with Mexico. They also said some people who enter Arizona without authorization commit identity theft and take advantage of public benefits. Opponents say the proposal would lead to racial profiling, hurt Arizona’s reputation in the business world and carry huge unfunded costs for police departments that don’t typically enforce immigration law.
In early June, the Republican-controlled Legislature voted to put the measure on the ballot, bypassing Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs, who had vetoed a similar measure in early March and had denounced the effort to bring the issue to voters.
This isn’t the first time Republican lawmakers in Arizona have tried to criminalize migration.
When passing its 2010 immigration bill, the Arizona Legislature considered expanding the state’s trespassing law to criminalize the presence of immigrants and impose criminal penalties. But the trespassing language was removed and replaced with a requirement that officers, while enforcing other laws, question people’s immigration status if they were believed to be in the country illegally.
The questioning requirement was ultimately upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court despite the racial profiling concerns of critics, but courts barred enforcement of other sections of the law. Earlier this week, the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office said supporters of a proposal that would enshrine abortion rights in the state’s constitution had gathered enough signatures to put the measure on the November ballot. If approved, it would allow abortions until a fetus could survive outside the womb, typically around 24 weeks, with exceptions to save the mother’s life or to protect her physical or mental health. Abortion is currently legal for the first 15 weeks of pregnancy in Arizona.
veryGood! (43398)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- As the pandemic ebbs, an influential COVID tracker shuts down
- For Many Nevada Latino Voters, Action on Climate Change is Key
- Greenpeace Activists Avoid Felony Charges Following a Protest Near Houston’s Oil Port
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- In Charleston, S.C., Politics and Budgets Get in the Way of Cutting Carbon Emissions
- How financial counseling at the pediatrician's office can help families thrive
- Trump Makes Nary a Mention of ‘Climate Change,’ Touting America’s Fossil Fuel Future
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Study Finds Rise in Methane in Pennsylvania Gas Country
Ranking
- Sam Taylor
- Another Cook Inlet Pipeline Feared to Be Vulnerable, As Gas Continues to Leak
- Johnny Depp Arrives at Cannes Film Festival 2023 Amid Controversy
- Vanderpump Rules Finale Bombshells: The Fallout of Scandoval & Even More Cheating Confessions
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Maryland Climate Ruling a Setback for Oil and Gas Industry
- Inside Tori Spelling's 50th Birthday With Dean McDermott, Candy Spelling and More
- Saving Ecosystems to Protect the Climate, and Vice Versa: a Global Deal for Nature
Recommendation
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Iconic Forests Reaching Climate Tipping Points in American West, Study Finds
Saving Ecosystems to Protect the Climate, and Vice Versa: a Global Deal for Nature
'Do I really need to floss?' and other common questions about dental care
The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
Jennifer Lopez Details Her Kids' Difficult Journey Growing Up With Famous Parents
Coal’s Steep Decline Keeps Climate Goal Within Reach, Report Says
5 Science Teams Racing Climate Change as the Ecosystems They Study Disappear